In the Middle of a Clash Zone: Role of Belarus in the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict

Article

Although during the Russian war in Ukraine, Belarus may be qualified as a Russian proxy, paradoxically, it can be as well perceived as a country struggling to save the rest of its independence from Moscow. ...

Although during the Russian war in Ukraine, Belarus may be qualified as a Russian proxy, paradoxically, it can be as well perceived as a country struggling to save the rest of its independence from Moscow.

Being located exactly on the principal geopolitical axis of Eastern Europe, between Russia and the Collective West (EU plus NATO), Belarus is put before a strategic choice between the two with the space of neutrality dramatically shrinking. Although culturally and historically European, it is a country with post-Soviet political system which makes it incompatible with Western integrational projects. At the same time, neither the society nor the authoritarian president manifest any willingness to renounce sovereignty and become a part of the neo-imperial “Russian World“.

Belarus’s position in the Russia-Ukraine war is a function of Minsk’s relations with Moscow. The weaker Belarus is internally, the more it has to comply with Kremlin’s demands for cooperation. The war turns out to play a role of a principal marker of its sovereignty: as long as Lukashenka is able to oppose Putin’s demand to take active part in Russian attack, the decision-making autonomy and thus the rest of independence remains and Belarus may be treated as partially-sovereign. Strategically sovereign, yet not economically that forms an interesting case from the point of view of political theory: usually satellites are less independent politically than economically and here, between Russian metropolis and Belorussian colony, the situation is reversed.

Lukashenka stays reluctant to openly support Russia because taking an active part in the war would constitute a critical risk for the stability of the regime both externally (being exposed to a an obvious Ukrainian response) and internally (it is not certain if the army and law-enforcement forces would stay loyal to the president or rather chose for a regime change).

Belarus has absolutely no reason for any kind of conflict with Ukraine and thus, both the elite around Lukashenko, the president himself and the society see no reason for an engagement. For Belarus, there is nothing to win and a lot to potentially lose from a direct conflict with Kiev. The only reason and incentive to let Russia operate from Belorussian territory is Moscow’s coercion resulting from economic dependance that regulates the social situation inside Belarus: if Minsk doesn’t agree for this or that Russian demand, Moscow will simply rise the price of oil and gas or close its market for Belorussian exportations, automatically rising tension inside the republic whose economy forms a kind of living museum of Soviet-style etatism (inefficient and having no sense from the point of view of contemporary market-oriented economy).

As a result, the state of Belorussian economy makes it very difficult, not to say impossible to diversify country’s foreign policy: Belarus has nothing to offer to Europe, China or any other partner and thus remains dependent on Kremlin that is the only one ready to pay economic price for political benefits offered by Minsk). Russian influence inside Belarus is the price paid for Russia’s support of Lukashenka’s regime and this price went higher after the 2020 elections that showed the ultimate collapse of his legitimacy everywhere beyond the army, police and bureaucracy – the only remaining factor of its stability is Moscow’s support, both financial (to finance the illusion of Belorussian economic miracle) and political (the constant danger of Russia’s direct intervention à la Czechoslovakia in 1968).

This content is protected by Copyright under the Trademark Certificate. It may be partially quoted, provided that the source is cited, its link is given and the name and title of the editor/author (if any) is mentioned exactly the same. When these conditions are fulfilled, there is no need for additional permission. However, if the content is to be used entirely, it is absolutely necessary to obtain written permission from TASAM.

Areas

Continents ( 5 Fields )
Action
 Contents ( 480 ) Actiivities ( 219 )
Areas
TASAM Africa 0 150
TASAM Asia 0 241
TASAM Europe 0 44
TASAM Latin America & Carribea... 0 35
TASAM North America 0 10
Regions ( 4 Fields )
Action
 Contents ( 179 ) Actiivities ( 54 )
Areas
TASAM Balkans 0 93
TASAM Middle East 0 63
TASAM Black Sea and Caucasus 0 16
TASAM Mediterranean 0 7
Identity Fields ( 2 Fields )
Action
 Contents ( 176 ) Actiivities ( 75 )
Areas
TASAM Islamic World 0 147
TASAM Turkic World 0 29
TASAM Türkiye ( 1 Fields )
Action
 Contents ( 229 ) Actiivities ( 60 )
Areas
TASAM Türkiye 0 229

The agenda of Iran is mostly based on Islamic Revolution and Nuclear Energy issues. Geo-political location can be seen as the root of discomfort by the West. The Persian Gulf which still has a big importance to the United Nations in case of nuclear energy and security. 1 This security analysis aimed...;

Since 2000, when Vladimir Putin came to power as President of Russia, Moscow has begun to use a complex ecosystem of information, disinformation and misinformation as a global tool that it has placed at the centre of its national security strategy. This ecosystem played an important role in helping ...;

Russia backed separatists fighting against the Ukrainian army in the war that started in 2014 and annexed Crimea from Ukraine. On 24 February 2022, Russia escalated this war and invaded Ukraine. This was the most devastating attack on a European country since World War II. Türkiye as a neighbouring ...;

Despite a strong historical and cultural background, the relations between Türkiye and the Middle East, or more narrowly, Türkiye and the Gulf Countries, where strategic dialogue is still evolving, need to transform from a fragile axis into a cooperation axis that adapts to new balances, roles, and ...;

In his interview to Tucker Carlson, Vladimir Putin talked a lot about “historical rights“ of Russia to control what he perceives as a buffer zone between Russia and the West. But what is simply a territory for Moscow, is a social and political reality for the states who exist there and have their ow...;

We are very glad to be together at the 9th Istanbul Security Conference and its co-events, which we have continued without any disruption until today. We extend our gratitude to all our guests, both domestic and international.;

Although after the war ends, Ukraine will most certainly keep its status of an independent state, the final quality of its statehood and nationhood is undefined. Russia’s ongoing destruction of Ukraine has already changed its demographic, economic and social structure with the most severe long-term ...;

In the 100th year of the Republic, on 23-24 November 2023, the 9th Istanbul Security Conference titled as "Strategic Transformation in the Ecosystem" will be held by TASAM-NDSI with global participation at Istanbul Kent University Kağıthane Campus. Last day to register is today, and the Participants...;

East Mediterranean Program 2023-2025

  • 17 Jul 2023 - 19 Jul 2023
  • Sheraton Istanbul City Center -
  • İstanbul - Türkiye

5th Marine and Maritime Security Forum

  • 23 Nov 2023 - 24 Nov 2023
  • Istanbul Kent University Kağıthane Campus -
  • İstanbul - Türkiye

2nd Istanbul Cyber-Security Forum

  • 23 Nov 2023 - 24 Nov 2023
  • Istanbul Kent University Kağıthane Campus -
  • İstanbul - Türkiye

7th Türkiye - Gulf Defence and Security Forum

  • 23 Nov 2023 - 24 Nov 2023
  • Istanbul Kent University Kağıthane Campus -
  • İstanbul - Türkiye