The Failure of AU’s Policies and the Prospect of a New Security Architecture in Africa

Article

For over two decades, the African union has been functioning with the main agenda to promote unity, peace, and prosperity for all its members. However, since its inception, the AU has been swamped with challenges raging from the rampant insecurity and political turmoil bedevilling the continent. ...

Usman Aliyu Uba, PhD Candidate
Istanbul Aydin University

Abstract

For over two decades, the African union has been functioning with the main agenda to promote unity, peace, and prosperity for all its members. However, since its inception, the AU has been swamped with challenges raging from the rampant insecurity and political turmoil bedevilling the continent. While the organization has contributed relentlessly to promote good governance and democracy yet, it’s arguably inundated with decade old policies and hijacked by aged leaders. Nevertheless, the AU is financially weak and reliant on external donors, even before the onset of the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 – followed by the subsequent political and economic consequences. Then the war between Russia and Ukraine and its ramifications, has sent shockwaves to the continent already reeling from the COVID-19 setbacks.

Moreover, the so-called traditional allies or European partners particularly France among others have been pulling out from the continent, after failing to help address crises and tackle the insecurity problems especially in the troubled Sahel region. At this junction, the AU is in dire need of reliable strategic partner capable of building robust policies that could help address several insecurity problems facing many African countries. This article is aimed to borrow Buzan’s idea of “securitization theory“ to argue that while the African Union is aimed to promote peace and development on the continent, the lack of finance and reliable partners are partly responsible for the insecurity and underdevelopment of the continent. The article concluded that Türkiye security commitment from 2008-2021, will help provide a road map for the sustainable development of Africa.

  1. Introduction
In September 2022, the African union celebrated its 20th anniversary since its creation as an organisation aimed to promote peace, stability, and development across the continent. Notwithstanding AU’s effort to address several challenges engulfing African states, its lacklustre performance has overshadowed its ability to provide a path forward in solving several crises. Some analysts have argued that its partly due to the deteriorating consensus over the organisations’ key principles. Arguably, the solidarity among member states’ is at all time low – a quagmire resulted from lack of commitment to the principles and values of the organization.[1] The Lack of consensus among member states is partly due to weak leadership across many African countries.

Insecurity challenges are resulted from “governance-related issue“ including contested electoral process, corruption, mismanagement of public funds, violations of human rights and essential freedoms. The strong correlation between poor governance and instability in many African states has been widely recognized by scholars (Bedzigui 2018). In 2002, the African union established its Peace and Security Architecture (APSA) as a mechanism designed to prevent conflict and promote peace and security across the continent. However, AU member state have left APSA underfunded which led to its high dependency on foreign donors.[2] Experts have argued that genuine African solutions to the lack of funding the AU, will be more effective than just over dependence on foreign donations.


[1] “The African Union Peace and Security dilemma“ Paul-Simon Handy and Félicité Djilo ISS. https://issafrica.org/iss-today/the-african-unions-peace-and-security-dilemma
[2] APSA Roadmap 2016-2020, p. 58. https://au.int/en/documents/20200331/africa-peace-and-security-architecture-apsa-roadmap-2016-2020

This content is protected by Copyright under the Trademark Certificate. It may be partially quoted, provided that the source is cited, its link is given and the name and title of the editor/author (if any) is mentioned exactly the same. When these conditions are fulfilled, there is no need for additional permission. However, if the content is to be used entirely, it is absolutely necessary to obtain written permission from TASAM.

Areas

Continents ( 5 Fields )
Action
 Contents ( 486 ) Actiivities ( 223 )
Areas
TASAM Africa 0 153
TASAM Asia 0 243
TASAM Europe 0 44
TASAM Latin America & Carribea... 0 34
TASAM North America 0 12
Regions ( 4 Fields )
Action
 Contents ( 182 ) Actiivities ( 56 )
Areas
TASAM Balkans 0 95
TASAM Middle East 0 64
TASAM Black Sea and Caucasus 0 16
TASAM Mediterranean 0 7
Identity Fields ( 2 Fields )
Action
 Contents ( 176 ) Actiivities ( 75 )
Areas
TASAM Islamic World 0 147
TASAM Turkic World 0 29
TASAM Türkiye ( 1 Fields )
Action
 Contents ( 234 ) Actiivities ( 61 )
Areas
TASAM Türkiye 0 234

The 11th Istanbul Security Conference, organized under the theme "Defense, Security, and Intelligence Revolution," concluded with the participation of numerous prominent figures and experts from Turkey and abroad.;

The EU’s SAFE (Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform)¹ initiative promises substantial funding for strengthening Europe’s defence industrial base. However, participation in SAFE cannot come at the expense of Türkiye’s strategic interests, especially given politicization attempts by Greece and t...;

The European Union (EU) has structured its migration management in the post-2015 period largely on a security-centric approach. Following the 2015 refugee crisis, the EU's migration management strategies have largely focused on border control and externalization policies, leading to human righ...;

Artificial intelligence is reshaping economies, governance, and everyday life. But democratization means more than deployment—it means empowering every citizen, in every language and community, not just elite urban users. Here the access to those who have and those who have not is also a question of...;

Türkiye’s emergence as a decisive middle power in global AI governance depends on its potential and the strategic mobilization of its governance capacity. The second part of this article demonstrates how Türkiye can leverage its advantages, such as its technical competencies, foreign policy architec...;

“Trade Corridors’ Security and Türkiye” Despite the strong historical and cultural background, it is no longer an option but an obligation for Türkiye - Middle East, or more narrowly, Türkiye - Gulf Countries relations, in which strategic dialogue is still developing, to transform from a fragile ...;

TURKIYE AS A MIDDLE POWER IN AI GOVERNANCE “From Bridge Diplomacy to Decisive Leverage: The Rise of Middle Powers in AI Geopolitics” AI is reshaping global power paradigms. Türkiye can emerge as a strategic middle power by leveraging its demographic strengths, expanding technology capabilities,...;

Between 1997 and 2002, the Bosnian Constitutional Court made critical decisions, such as the U 5/98 case. This case addressed the compatibility of the Dayton Constitution with the constitutions of the Republika Srpska and the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. ;

11th Istanbul Security Conference (2025)

  • 27 Nov 2025 - 28 Nov 2025
  • Wish More Hotel Istanbul -
  • İstanbul -

8th Türkiye - Gulf Defence and Security Forum

  • 21 Nov 2024 - 22 Nov 2024
  • Istanbul - Türkiye

7th Türkiye - Africa Defence Security and Aerospace Forum

  • 21 Nov 2024 - 22 Nov 2024
  • İstanbul - Türkiye

3rd Istanbul Cyber-Security Forum

  • 21 Nov 2024 - 22 Nov 2024
  • İstanbul - Türkiye

6th Marine and Maritime Security Forum

  • 21 Nov 2024 - 22 Nov 2024
  • İstanbul - Türkiye

10th Istanbul Security Conference

  • 21 Nov 2024 - 22 Nov 2024
  • İstanbul - Türkiye