Iran and Violent Non-State Actors: The ISIS Case


Since Khomeini’s coming to power in 1979, one pillar of Iranian foreign policy is its grand network with the local groups/ Violent Non-State Actors (VNSAs) which the Western world named as terrorist. The second pillar is its uranium enrichment policy in order to have a leverage against the Western efforts to isolate it from the international society....

Prof. Dr. Özden Zeynep OKTAV
İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi

Since Khomeini’s coming to power in 1979, one pillar of Iranian foreign policy is its grand network with the local groups/ Violent Non-State Actors (VNSAs) which the Western world named as terrorist. The second pillar is its uranium enrichment policy in order to have a leverage against the Western efforts to isolate it from the international society. The three important developments transformed those two pillars-uranium enrichment policy and its relations with the VNSAs. One was the election of Hassan Rouhani to the presidency in 2013 who promised to relieve Iran’s international isolation and to end crippling sanctions. The second was the rise of a NSAG, Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS)- an Al-Qaeda breakaway group (Daesh in Arabic and Persian) especially after the fall of Mosul in 2014. Third development was the finalization of a long term historic nuclear deal with the P5 1 in 2015. This paper offers a review of key milestones in Iran’s response to the emergence of ISIS at a time when the above-mentioned three developments took place and Tehran initiated tectonic changes in its relations with the international society. Simply put, the article will mainly focus on the impact of ISIS on Iran’s evolving role in the international system and its relations with the United States. The impact of Qatar crisis on Iranian policies toward the region will be another concern of the article.

1. A Brief History of Iranian Usage of Non-State Armed Groups

According to many analysts, Iran began employing NSAGs shortly after Khomeini came to power mainly due to two developments. One was the 1980 invasion of Iran by Saddam Hussein, the second was the hawkish policies of the Reagan administration in Washington. Leaving aside Iran’s feeling of strategic encirclement, Khomeini’s desire to re-establish his ties with the Shiite groups in order to incite a pan-Shiite movement brought about the adoption of a strategy that relied upon a network of NSAGs. (O’brien 2006, 53) Speaking on the significance of the maintenance of the integrity of the state while simultaneously expanding the influence of Shiism and Iran, Khomeini described NSAGs as a network constructed upon his personal relationship with other Shiite leaders to weaken Iran’s rivals, namely, the United States, Iraq and Israel. As O’brien notes that ‘as the NSAGs were expanded, Iran created a large web of interconnected yet disassociated NSAGs. Initially this web was regional; ultimately, it spread to enjoy global capabilities.’ (2006, 59) According to Tabarani, NSAGs were seen by Iran as a part of its state security. As the utility of these armed groups and the proficiency of Iranian Revolutionary Armed Corps (IRGC) became more apparent, Christian and Sunni groups were equally able to draw support from Iran.( Tabarani 2008, 71) Iranian style of security understanding had far-reaching political and strategic ramifications. For example, as noted by the IRGC’s commander, Yahya Rahim Safavi, ‘the IRGC has no geographical border. The Islamic revolution is the border of the IRGC. It has an extensive network of contacts across the Muslim world, with a particular emphasis on Lebanon, Iraq, the Gulf region, and the wider Arab world in general.’ (Byman, Chubin, Ehteshami, Green, 2001) Simply put, Iranian revisionism was related to status, not land. By touting the country’s revolutionary credentials to impress sympathizers abroad, Iran aimed both to legitimize/ validate its theocratic regime at home and to cope with the power asymmetry stemming from advanced weapons technology of the West. A war through ideas rather than technology by means of ideologically motivated NSAGs provided Iran with an inexpensive power projection capability. As O’brien explains, ‘Tehran can hit targets inside an enemy as distant as the United States without developing an inter continental ballistic missile or an aircraft carrier.’ (O’brien 2006, 28)

Link to the related book: New Security Ecosystem and Multilateral Cost
This content is protected by Copyright under the Trademark Certificate. It may be partially quoted, provided that the source is cited, its link is given and the name and title of the editor/author (if any) is mentioned exactly the same. When these conditions are fulfilled, there is no need for additional permission. However, if the content is to be used entirely, it is absolutely necessary to obtain written permission from TASAM.


Continents ( 5 Fields )
 Contents ( 465 ) Actiivities ( 219 )
Africa 0 148
Asia 0 234
Europe 0 40
Latin America & Carribean 0 34
North America 0 9
Regions ( 4 Fields )
 Contents ( 176 ) Actiivities ( 53 )
Balkans 0 93
Middle East 0 61
Black Sea and Caucasus 0 16
Mediterranean 0 6
Identity Fields ( 2 Fields )
 Contents ( 176 ) Actiivities ( 74 )
Islamic World 0 147
Turkish World 0 29
Turkey ( 1 Fields )
 Contents ( 221 ) Actiivities ( 59 )
Turkey 0 221

Just beyond the Russian-Ukrainian War of February 24, 2022, Turkey has made great efforts to play the role of mediator between the two Black Sea states. Turkey has recently emerged as a reasonable and rational diplomatic player and has assumed a historically peaceful role in the conflict between Rus...;

Countries with strong historical consciousness and long political traditions often have to adapt their strategy to be able to face contemporary challenges. But even in the postmodern, information-oriented world, experience (even a bitter one) may be an advantage and not a burden. ;

Following the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, the three Caucasian countries Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia underwent an eventful process of democratization. Of the three, Georgia’s journey to Western-style democracy has witnessed civil uprisings, revolution, corruption, judicial reforms, and mil...;

As it was firstly held in Türkiye in 2015, the 9th of Istanbul Security Conference with the main theme of "Strategic Transformation in the Ecosystem: Climate, Nourishment, Demography, Meritocracy, Economy, Health, Education, Employment, Family-Youth and City Security" will be held by TASAM National ...;

Belt and Road Initiative; US-China competition; Biden-Xi talks; peacebuilding; Middle East;

Turkish Asian Center for Strategic Studies (TASAM) and the Institute for Strategic Studies of National Security Council of Mongolia (ISS) have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) agreement. ;

Issues related to maritime claims, access, and the quest for energy resources have always been considered as significant aspects of sea power, strategy and security. The Eastern Mediterranean at the turn of the 21st century is not an exception to that, particularly in the light of recent hydrocarbon...;

Information is power when kept properly and may be cause of failure if it is not conducted and managed in the right way. Today information technologies and global networks enable risk factors to spread easier compare to previous eras of human history.;