Turkey - Russia High Competition High Cooperation

Interview

Turkey - Russia High Competition High Cooperation...

( Interview | TASAM Chair Süleyman ŞENSOY | by Ariel GONZALES, Koç University, Dept. of International Relations | 25.10.2016, Istanbul )

How do you evaluate the dynamics of the relations between Russia and Turkey in the Cold War and the Post-Cold War?

During the Cold War, the relations between Turkey and Russia were based on strong competition and low degrees of cooperation. That's the way it developed. It was a period that started with the request of Kars province, the East lands of Turkey and joint control of the Bosporus. Therefore, Turkey was pushed towards NATO. Since the end of the Second World War, Turkey has been seen as a police station against the Soviet enlargement. Therefore, the fact that Turkey and Iran were against the Soviets till 1979 was very important for the West. After the 1979 Iranian revolution, Turkey became more important because Iran had an anti-American Islamic Regime, and continued like that till the collapse of the Soviet Union. In fact, in Turkey when you look at the very large technological investment and goods agreements, these were not provided by the West, but Russia made it. You can see large industrial plants built by Russia. But in general terms, political relations were within NATO's framework so it continued as ‘high competition and low cooperation’ till the USSR dissolved because Turkey's historical genetics are on the mind. The last Ottoman state, the last 200-250 years were of Turkish-Russian confrontation in the Black Sea, in the Caucasus, in the Balkans, in Central Asia. The Russian-Turkish struggle had already existed in the sub-structure for the conflicts of the population areas. During the Cold War, along with the republic establishment the balanced policy pursued evolved towards a Western policy with a slightly more radical scrape.


Should be expand on post-Cold War period

What is the role of Turkey in Caucasus and Central Asia after the Cold War?

The Caucasus expressed a rupture for Turkey during the Soviet period. In Central Asia there was a disconnection. There were cultural interactions but economic and political relationships were minimized. In the Caucasus and Central Asia, Turkey tried to be active, entered the game knowing the regional history and geography and tried to be at least one of the game changers. But due to some economic problems that Turkey faced from 1994, the frequent changes of government in the confrontational environment of Turkish politics, weak mandates for a little while, it has not been successful. But, we have strong relations with Azerbaijan, and developed good relationship with Georgia. For example, Turkish people can go to Georgia without using the passport. With Azerbaijan, the slogan "one nation, two states" was created. We can also see, there were strong relations built with Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. With Turkmenistan, there is a relationship with a slightly lower profile, but in Uzbekistan there is also a political relationship that didn't die on that period. Anyway, Turkey could not reach the goals neither influence as originally proposed itself to do from the beginning, because the competition there has increased, very big players entered, and couldn't sustain the advantageous position in the first years. But, at present, when we look at Turkish political relations with all regional actors except Uzbekistan, Turkey is in strong ties. But economically it doesn't reach the desired goals.


In relation to Armenia, how Turkey has been positioned regarding the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict?

I guess since the beginning of the conflict Turkey has been on Azerbaijan’s side. In fact, there is not a sense of belonging to Armenia, because it has been supported by Russia. There, there is a tendency for the Turkish people to be physically separated from the Turkic world. Nakhichevan does not have territorial integrity in Azerbaijan, it has a border with Turkey. The physical connection was lost so that both Azerbaijan on one side and the other side as well have a physical disconnection. Turkey has been standing by Azerbaijan’s side since the time the conflict started and supported it both with military and with logistics. Thanks to Turkey also the settlement of the 20% of the border was accomplished. That day if Turkey did not support the siege perhaps Azerbaijan could be completely withdrawn. Although some of the sanctions were increased, this continues as a crisis but I guess Turkey is always on Azerbaijan's side.


In relation with the US and EU, are they interfering in the relations between Turkey and Russia?

The last few years, they interfere seriously, pay attention to every movement, because the relations in the region between the EU and US, and Russia used to be very good. But since the Georgia intervention in 2006, and since the EU and NATO have tried to expand into the Black Sea, the West interfered in the relations and provoked a spinning process of the territorial integrity of Ukraine. So, due to these relations between Russia and the West, that is the EU and US, Turkey, as a NATO member, has suffered and confronted with Russia in the Black Sea, in the Caucasus, and of course it was adversely affected. This, of course, led to a process that went as far as the Russian plane shutdown in Syria, but Turkey returned to the balanced policy again.


How has the energy helped to strength the relations between Turkey and Russia?

It keeps coming up very much, because Turkey imports energy from Russia. On top of this, in addition, Turkey's first nuclear power plant in Akkuyu-Mersin-Turkey, was finally given tendered to the Russians. Therefore, the energy is a very determining issue in Turkish - Russian relations. However, as there has not been a strong support for the Turkish crises last ten years, we have a formula: Turkish - Russian relations need to be taken in the form of high competition and high cooperation. It is romantic to talk only about cooperation. It is unfair only to talk about competition. Therefore, there are many fields where we can work both historically and in the present. Thus, the topics can be managed without entering the confrontation, the "high competition and the high cooperation" formula is made for this. There is a mutual dependency in the construction field too. Demonstrations in the dimension of dependence on the relations between Russia and Turkey are in favour of Russia. Turkey needs to balance this relation with Russia and not rely to that extent. More industry needs to be improved.


How do you interpret this process of a big crisis with the aircraft shooting in November of last year, until the reconciliation process? Is there a strategic partnership or is just kind of pragmatic relations that are going on?

Of course, what will happen to Russia and Turkey, it will be a determinant factor to the world. This is my thesis. What will Russia be is determinant to what Turkey will be. And what Turkey will be determinant to what Russia will be. There's a paradox between these two. So, as a conjecture these two countries are very much in need of one another. Particularly Russia needs Turkey when we look at the global balance. Thus, with a country like Russia it is normal to agree and fight, that is the suffering shock that the relation has always lived in. But first of all, it is necessary to think about the historical influence of the relations. It seems that it will take a while longer. Then, we will see to what extent the relations will get to, and then we can talk. But Turkey is a NATO member country, trying to enter the EU. At least the negotiations are seen. And 70% of our dependence is on the Western side. So, I think with Russia the possible union it should be addressed as strong but fragile, because the political values require it. But if Russia knows clearly the position of Turkey, it will help to ensure and build trust in the relation. If not, Russians know that Turkish - Russian relations are in a polarized position and also open to crisis, every time there is a conflict. Of course, it is also very important for Russia the legal strategy that the Bosporus is under the control of Turkey and in the Black Sea, NATO does not come out at a certain limit, as it was accepted in 1936 in the Montreux Convention. Turkey has a great need for food. In addition, there are great challenges in Russia both economically and socially. Also in the world we have come to an obstacle point where there is a great competition atmosphere. Therefore, I think that the relations between Russia and Turkey will come to a balanced level, but very radical racism and religion need to be decreased. Well, there is no right conjecture about this but if the system like after the 2nd World War is destroyed and a new system needs to be built, then different scenes may be discussed.
This content is protected by Copyright under the Trademark Certificate. It may be partially quoted, provided that the source is cited, its link is given and the name and title of the editor/author (if any) is mentioned exactly the same. When these conditions are fulfilled, there is no need for additional permission. However, if the content is to be used entirely, it is absolutely necessary to obtain written permission from TASAM.

Areas

Continents ( 5 Fields )
Action
 Contents ( 458 ) Actiivities ( 218 )
Areas
Africa 0 144
Asia 0 233
Europe 0 39
Latin America & Carribean 0 34
North America 0 8
Regions ( 4 Fields )
Action
 Contents ( 173 ) Actiivities ( 52 )
Areas
Balkans 0 93
Middle East 0 59
Black Sea and Caucasus 0 16
Mediterranean 0 5
Identity Fields ( 2 Fields )
Action
 Contents ( 175 ) Actiivities ( 74 )
Areas
Islamic World 0 146
Turkish World 0 29
Turkey ( 1 Fields )
Action
 Contents ( 219 ) Actiivities ( 57 )
Areas
Turkey 0 219

Uluslararası İlişkiler, Kamu yönetimi vb. bölümlerin 3./4. sınıf lisans öğrencisi olup İngilizce B2 ve üstü yeterliliğe sahip, Office programlarını iyi derecede kullanan adaylar STAJ başlığı ile CV ve ön yazı göndererek hemen başvurabilirler. info@tasam.org ;

Gorbaçov’un kişiliğinin gizemi, insan Gorbaçov ile devlet adamı Gorbaçov arasındaki ayrıma dayanıyor. Çok farklı iki insandı. Ütopyasının özünde saf bir Leninizm’in olduğu bir Sovyetler Birliği ve Lizbon’dan Vladivostok'a barışçıl bir şekilde uzanan bir Avrupa vardı. O, iktidardaki entelektüelin büy...;

İnsanlığın karşı karşıya olduğu son dönemin en önemli tehdidi şüphesiz iklim değişikliğidir. Küresel ölçekte felaket senaryolarının merkezinde yer alması bunun göstergelerindendir. Buna karşın iklim değişikliği sorunu, kriz olgusunun doğası gereği içerisinde tehditlerle birlikte birtakım fırsatları ...;

Türkiye, denizlerin paylaşım mücadelesi kapsamında “kazan kazan” stratejisini benimsemektedir. Denizden komşusu kıyıdaş devletlerin Türkiye ile anlaşmaları durumunda ne kadar deniz yetki alanı kazanacaklarını göstermek üzerine bir strateji benimseyen Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Devleti, kendisi ile anlaşmam...;

Arktik Okyanusu son dönemlerde uluslararası siyasetin öne çıkan bölgelerinden birisi hâline gelmiştir. Dev buz kütlelerinin küresel ısınmayla birlikte büyük bir ekolojik değişim dönemine girmesi hem Kuzey Kutup Dairesi’ne hem de kıyıdaş ülkelere yeni fırsatlar sunarken, aynı zamanda bu fırsatları ko...;

Çoğumuz çocukluğumuzdan bu yana duyduğumuz kabotaj kelimesinin yeni kurulan Türkiye Cumhuriyeti için ne anlama geldiğinin pek farkında değilizdir. Kabotaj, yüzyıllardır Osmanlıyı sömüren kapitülasyonların, yani ülkenin sömürülmesi için yabancılara izin verilen bir hakkın adıdır. Bu imtiyaz ile yaban...;

Avrupa Birliği (AB)'nden ayrılarak tarihinde yeni bir sayfa açan Birleşik Krallık, aktif bir küresel oyuncu olarak rolünü yeniden tanımlamak istemekte ve vizyon ve stratejisini kendisinin belirlediği güvenlik, savunma, kalkınma, uluslararası ilişkiler alanında yeni arayışlar içerisinde bulunmaktadır...;

II. Dünya Savaşı sonrasında ABD ve Birleşik Krallık tarafından temeli atılan Beş Göz ittifakı, Birleşik Krallık, ABD, Kanada, Avustralya ve Yeni Zelanda arasındaki teknik istihbarat iş birliği mekanizmasıdır. Sorumluluk sahaları açıkça beyan edilmese de üye ülkelerin dünyanın belirli bölgelerine yön...;

4. Denizcilik Ve Deniz Güvenliği Forumu 2022

  • 03 Nov 2022 - 04 Nov 2022
  • Harbiye Askerî Müzesi ve Kültür Sitesi -
  • İstanbul - Türkiye

10. Balkan İletişim Ağı Konferansı

  • 2023
  • CVK Park Bosphorus Oteli -
  • İstanbul - Türkiye

9. Dünya İslam Forumu

  • 2022
  • İstanbul -
  • İstanbul - Türkiye

"Türkiye - Rusya İlişkileri" Konferansı

  • 22 Jun 2005 - 22 Jun 2005
  • İstanbul - Türkiye

3. Denizcilik ve Deniz Güvenliği Forumu 2021

  • 04 Nov 2021 - 05 Nov 2021
  • DoubleTree by Hilton İstanbul Ataşehir Oteli ve Konferans Merkezi -
  • İstanbul - Türkiye

Pandemi Sonrası Türkiye’nin Ekonomi ve Teknoloji Vizyonu Toplantısı

  • 17 Dec 2020 - 17 Dec 2020
  • TSİ 14.00 - Çevrimiçi -
  • İstanbul - Türkiye

Türk Asya Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi TASAM, Dr. Cengiz Topel MERMER’in hazırladığı “ABD Hegemonyasına Meydan Okuyan Çin’in Zorlu Virajı; Güney Çin Denizi” isimli stratejik raporu yayımladı.

Türk Asya Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi TASAM, Dr. Cengiz Topel MERMER’in uzun araştırmalar sonunda hazırladığı “TEKNOLOJİK ÜRETİMDE BAĞIMSIZLIK SORUNU; NTE'LER VE ÇİPLER ÜZERİNDE KÜRESEL REKABET” isimli stratejik raporu yayımladı

Türk Asya Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi TASAM, Dr. Cengiz Topel MERMER’in hazırladığı “Sri Lanka’nın Çöküşüne Küresel Siyaset Çerçevesinden Bir Bakış” isimli stratejik raporu yayımladı.

Türk Asya Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi TASAM, Dr. Cengiz Topel MERMER’in hazırladığı “Çin-Japon Anlaşmazlığında Doğu Çin Denizi Derinlerdeki Travmalar” isimli stratejik raporu yayımladı.

Türk Asya Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi TASAM, Dr. Cengiz Topel MERMER’in uzun araştırmalar sonunda hazırladığı “MYANMAR; Büyük Oyunun Doğu Sahnesi” isimli stratejik raporu yayımladı

İngiltere’nin II. Dünya Savaşı sonrasında Hint Altkıtası’ndan çekilmek zorunda kalması sonucunda, 1947 yılında, din temelli ayrışma zemininde kurulan Hindistan ve Pakistan, İngiltere’nin bu coğrafyadaki iki asırlık idaresinin bütün mirasını paylaştığı gibi bıraktığı sorunlu alanları da üstlenmek dur...

Gündem 2063, Afrika'yı geleceğin küresel güç merkezine dönüştürecek yol haritası ve eylem planıdır. Kıtanın elli yıllık süreci kapsayan hedeflerine ulaşma niyetinin somut göstergesidir.

Geçmişte büyük imparatorluklar kuran Çin ve Hindistan, 20. asırda boyunduruktan kurtularak bağımsızlıklarına kavuşmuş ve ulus inşa sorunlarını aştıkça geçmişteki altın çağ imgelerinin cazibesine kapılmıştır.